AuditCore · Health & Safety · iAuditor alternative
Comparison

The iAuditor Alternative for UK Food Sites

By Anthony Oakes, Founder · Updated September 2026 · 8 min read

iAuditor is now Mitti. The inspection app launched as iAuditor on 17 February 2012, was renamed SafetyCulture on 21 November 2022, and became Mitti on 11 August 2026 when the whole company rebranded. It is the same app throughout — same accounts, same data, same integrations. If you are searching for iAuditor pricing or an iAuditor login, Mitti is what you are looking for.

Most people arrive here the same way. The free plan worked, the team liked it, more supervisors wanted logins — and then the eleventh user turned a free tool into a four-figure annual line item. This page is the arithmetic, and an honest account of when switching is and is not the right answer.

Where the free plan stops

Two limits end it, and the template cap usually bites first:

None of that is a criticism — a free tier has to end somewhere, and theirs is more generous than most. The issue is the shape of the cliff. You do not pay for the eleventh seat. You start paying for all eleven.

What it costs once you cross

Premium is $24 per seat per month billed annually (a 17% saving on the $29 monthly rate), excluding applicable taxes — so a UK buyer should add VAT on top.

Team sizeMitti PremiumAuditCore
5 users, one siteFree plan
within the 10-user free tier
£708/yr
£59/site/mo
11 users, one site$3,168/yr (≈£2,500)
11 seats × $24/mo
£1,188/yr
£99/site/mo
25 users, one site$7,200/yr (≈£5,690)
25 seats × $24/mo
£1,788/yr
£149/site/mo
50 users, one site$14,400/yr (≈£11,380)
50 seats × $24/mo
£1,788/yr
£149/site/mo

Mitti pricing as published at mitti.com/pricing, checked 18 September 2026, excluding tax. AuditCore at published per-site pricing: £59 (up to 5 users), £99 (6–20), £149 (21+). Sterling conversions approximate, for illustration only.

The pattern is the important part, not the individual numbers. Per-seat pricing scales with your headcount. Per-site pricing scales with your sites. A safety programme wants every supervisor inspecting; a per-seat model quietly charges you for exactly that. At 50 users on one site the two models are roughly six times apart, and the gap widens with every person you add.

One qualification, in fairness

Mitti’s Enterprise tier does list site-based pricing, so the per-seat problem is not absolute — it is a Premium-tier problem. Enterprise is custom-priced through their sales team, which in practice means it is aimed at large multi-site rollouts rather than a single food factory that has just outgrown the free plan. If you are big enough for Enterprise, get a quote and compare properly rather than trusting the table above.

Where Mitti is genuinely the better buy

Be honest about this before you switch

Under 10 users with simple needs, their free plan beats paying us anything. If five people run three templates and the findings do get closed, you do not have a software problem. Stay put.

Mitti is also the stronger choice if you need a large template marketplace, lone-worker monitoring, asset and equipment management, sensors and telematics, e-learning delivery, or deployment across thousands of users in many countries. It serves over two million frontline workers across some 80,000 organisations and has a large engineering team behind it. We are a focused tool for UK food sites, and there are things it does that we do not attempt.

Where a per-site audit system wins

Three things, and they are the reasons people actually move rather than just price:

1. The content is already written

AuditCore ships ISO 45001 (21 sections, 81 questions) and HSG65 (12 sections, 56 questions) as complete audit standards, plus 9 H&S inspection templates covering 140 items. You are not building a safety programme in a form designer; you are editing one written by a practising lead assessor.

2. Findings are non-conformances, not tasks

A failed inspection item raises a non-conformance with a severity, an owner and a due date. Closing it takes two stages: the immediate correction, then the root cause and the preventive action. Verification is done by someone other than the person who fixed it. That distinction is what an HSE inspector, an insurer or a customer auditor is actually testing when they ask to see your system.

3. Food safety and H&S in one register

If you are a UK food manufacturer you already run BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, SQF or SALSA audits. AuditCore runs those in the same system, with one register and a discipline filter. A general inspection platform gives you a second subscription, a second login and a second set of reports for the same factory.

Feature comparison

CapabilityMitti (formerly iAuditor)AuditCore
Mobile inspections, offline Strong Yes
Photo and annotation evidence Strong Photo and voice
Template library / marketplace Very large~ 9 H&S + food safety standards
ISO 45001 audit standard pre-loaded~ Community templates 21 sections, 81 questions
HSG65 audit standard pre-loaded~ Community templates 12 sections, 56 questions
BRC / FSSC / IFS / SQF / SALSA audits Pre-loaded
Two-phase CAPA with root cause~ Tasks & issues Required before close-out
Independent verification enforced Separate verifier
Repeat-finding detection~ Analytics Repeat NC detection
Lone worker, sensors, asset management Yes Not attempted
E-learning and training records Yes Not attempted
Pricing modelPer seat (site-based on Enterprise)Per site, all features
Free tier 10 users, 5 templates~ 14-day trial, no card

Which one you should pick

Stay on Mitti if you are inside the free tier and it is working, if you need the breadth — lone worker, sensors, assets, e-learning — or if you are rolling out across many sites in several countries.

Move to AuditCore if you are a UK food manufacturer who has just hit the free-plan ceiling, you want H&S and food safety audits in one register, and you need findings that close with a root cause and an independent verification rather than a tick.

What AuditCore is not

It is an audit, inspection and corrective action system. It is not a full EHS platform, and pretending otherwise would waste your trial.

It does not deliver e-learning or hold training certificates, store occupational health or health surveillance records, issue permits to work, or submit RIDDOR reports to the HSE. If those are your main requirement, buy a dedicated EHS suite. If your problem is that nobody can prove last quarter’s safety actions were closed, this is built for that.

Frequently asked questions

What happened to iAuditor?
iAuditor was renamed twice. The app launched as iAuditor on 17 February 2012, became SafetyCulture on 21 November 2022, and became Mitti on 11 August 2026 when the whole company rebranded. It is the same app throughout — the same App Store listing, accounts, data and integrations carried across each change, and nothing needed to be reconnected.
Is iAuditor the same as Mitti?
Yes. iAuditor, SafetyCulture and Mitti are the same product at three points in its history. The platform has broadened well beyond inspections into quality, maintenance, training and operations, which is the reason given for the 2026 rename, but an iAuditor login and its data are a Mitti login and its data.
What does iAuditor cost after the free plan?
As published at mitti.com/pricing and checked on 18 September 2026, the Premium plan is $24 per seat per month billed annually, or $29 billed monthly, excluding applicable taxes. The charge applies to every seat, not only those beyond the free allowance, so a team of 11 pays for 11 seats — roughly $3,168 a year before tax. Enterprise is custom-priced and does offer site-based pricing.
What are the limits of the iAuditor free plan?
The free tier covers up to 10 users, 5 active inspection templates and 300 AI credits per seat per month, with basic analytics, training and data history. For a food site the template cap usually bites first: covering safety tours, fire, machinery, manual handling, COSHH, work at height, slips and trips, PPE and welfare takes nine templates.
Is there a cheaper alternative to iAuditor for a single site?
For a single UK food manufacturing site, a per-site subscription is usually cheaper once you pass ten users, because the cost stops tracking headcount. AuditCore is £59 to £149 per site per month depending on team size, with every feature included. Whether it is the right alternative depends on whether you need inspection breadth or audit depth — the comparison above sets out both.
Can I run BRC audits and health and safety audits in the same system?
Yes. AuditCore ships BRC Issue 9, FSSC 22000 v6, IFS Food v8, SQF Edition 9 and SALSA alongside ISO 45001 and HSG65. Both disciplines share one non-conformance register with a discipline filter, so you can view everything open across the site or narrow to one. General inspection platforms do not carry GFSI food safety standards.
How long does it take to move off iAuditor?
Most sites are running in AuditCore within a day, because the H&S question sets and inspection templates are already written — there is nothing to build. Historic inspection records stay in your old account as reference; there is no data migration step, and the 14-day trial runs without a card so you can test before cancelling anything.

Try it before your renewal date

14-day free trial, no card required. ISO 45001, HSG65 and 9 safety templates ready to run.

Start Free Trial

Anthony Oakes — Founder, AuditCore 30 years in UK food manufacturing. Six Sigma Black Belt, Advanced HACCP Level 4, IRCA Lead Assessor. AuditCore is built from the audits he has run and sat.